汪周华;王子敦;郭平;邓丹;廖华伟;

• 1:西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室
• 2:吐哈油田公司勘探开发研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

通常情况下,随着地层压力降低,储层渗透率及流体性质的变化会导致气井产能方程随之发生变化。对于低渗透产水气藏,由于应力敏感、紊流效应、滑脱效应等非线性渗流效应及后期产水的影响,气井产能急剧降低。为了定量评价以上因素对气井产能的影响,基于常规二项式产能方程,建立了综合考虑地层压力变化、非线性渗流效应及产水对气井产能影响的产能方程。通过实例计算表明,由于应力敏感、紊流效应、滑脱效应等非线性渗流效应的综合影响,二项式系数A随地层压力的降低而减小,而系数B随地层压力的降低而增大;此外,由于后期产水影响,含水饱和度不断上升,气相相对渗透率随水气比的上升而减小,使二项式系数A、B均随水气比的上升而增大;因此,气井的产能下降幅度随地层压力下降呈线性升高趋势,随水气比下降呈对数降低趋势。该研究成果对于低渗透产水气井的产能预测及分析具有指导作用。

关键词(KeyWords)： 低渗透;产水气井;气井产能;应力敏感;滑脱效应;水气比

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家科技重大专项“致密砂岩气有效开发评价技术”(2011ZX05013-002)

作者(Author): 汪周华;王子敦;郭平;邓丹;廖华伟;

Email:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]郝玉鸿,王方元.地层压力下降对气井产能方程及无阻流量的影响分析[J].天然气工业,2000,20(1):71-74.
• [2]廖华伟,唐海,李宁,等.确定不同地层压力下气井产能的方法[J].天然气技术,2008,2(4):30-33.
• [3]徐立坤,窦宏恩,宋志同.低渗透储集层应力敏感性评价方法[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(1):107-111.
• [4]汪周华,钟兵,伊向艺,等.低渗气藏考虑非线性渗流特征的稳态产能方程[J].天然气工业,2008,28(8):81-83.
• [5]Tang Y,Yildiz T,Ozkan E,et al.Effects of Formation Damage and High-Velocity Flow on the Productivity of perforated horizontal wells[C]∥Anon.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2002.
• [6]Wang C,Li Z P,Lai F P.A novel binomial deliverability equation for fractured gas well considering non-Darcy effects[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,20:27-37.
• [7]郭肖,伍勇.启动压力梯度和应力敏感效应对低渗透气藏水平井产能的影响[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(4):539-543.
• [8]何军,范子菲,胡永乐,等.考虑多因素影响的低渗气藏气井产能预测新方法[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(5):156-159.
• [9]吕栋梁,唐海,吕渐江,等.气井产水时产能方程的确定[J].岩性油气藏,2011,22(4):112-115.
• [10]庞振宇,孙卫,雒婉莹,等.低渗透致密气藏水锁空间及伤害程度影响因素探析[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(3):140-144.
• [11]Xie X,Luo K,Song W,et al.A new and rigorous equation for modeling gas condensate well deliverability including an experimental study of revaporization of retrograde condensate[C]∥Anon.SPE Middle East Oil Show.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2001.
• [12]Fatt I.The effect of overburden pressure on relative permeability[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1953,5(10):15-16.
• [13]Li X,Huang B,Hu Y.The establishment and application of binomial deliverability equation for horizontal gas well[C]∥Anon.Canadian International Petroleum Conference.[S.l.]:Petroleum Society of Canada,2001.
• [14]张芨强,李晓平,袁淋,等.非达西渗流对低渗透气藏气水同产水平井产能的影响[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):120-125.
• [15]Vogel J V.Inflow performance relationships for solution-gas drive wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1968,20(1):83-92.
• [16]Houpeurt A.Sur l'ecoulement des gaz dans les milieuxporeux[M].[S.l.]:Soc.d.d.Technip.,1959.
• [17]Winestock A G,Colpitts G P.Advances in estimating gas well deliverability[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1965,4(3):111-119.
• [18]Mott R,Cable A,Spearing M.A new method of measuring relative permeabilities for calculating gas-condensate well deliverability[C]∥Anon.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1999.
• [19]Chase R W,Steffy C R.Predicting horizontal gas well deliverability using dimensionless IPR curves[C]∥Anon.SPE Eastern Regional Meeting.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2004.
• [20]刘之的,赵靖舟,高秋涛.利用MDT资料预测油气产能[J].地质科技情报,2013,32(1):163-166.
• [21]Hawkins Jr M F.A note on the skin effect[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1956,8(12):65-66.
• [22]李士伦.天然气工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:117-122.
• [23]Farquhar R A,Smart B G D,Todd A C,et al.Stress sensitivity of low-permeability sandstones from the Rotliegendes sandstone[C]∥Anon.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1993.
• [24]Klinkenberg L J.The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases[C]∥Anon.Drilling and production practice.[S.l.]:American Petroleum Institute,1941.
• [25]Frederick Jr D C,Graves R M.New correlations to predict nonDarcy flow coefficients at immobile and mobile water saturation[C]∥Anon.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.[S.l.]:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1994.
• [26]吕栋梁,唐海,黄小亮,等.不同气水比条件下气井液相伤害程度确定[J].天然气勘探与开发,2010,33(1):51-53.
• [27]黄小亮,唐海,杨再勇,等.产水气井的产能确定方法[J].油气井测试,2008,17(3):15-16.