抽水试验中两种直线图解法的对比Comparison on Two Kinds of Linear Graphic Approaches in Pumping Test
刘天霸;石建省;张永波;高业新;
摘要(Abstract):
应用定流量非稳定流抽水试验获取含水层水文地质参数时,常用的求解方法是Jacob直线图解法,而拟合直线的方法一般是基于最小二乘理论,但该方法易受异常值影响,拟合结果常常不理想,从而导致求解的参数值误差较大。相比最小二乘法,基于信息损失最小化的最频值算法对异常值不敏感,是一种更为稳健的算法。将最频值算法与Jacob直线图解法耦合,推导出了求解导水系数和贮水系数的新公式。最后,通过MATLAB环境下自行编制的程序,以受到不同水位影响效应的3个抽水试验为例,对两种直线图解法进行了对比分析。结果表明,基于最频值算法的直线图解法求参结果更准确可靠。
关键词(KeyWords): 抽水试验;水文地质参数;直线图解法;最频值算法;最小二乘算法
基金项目(Foundation): 国家“973”项目(2010CB428800)
作者(Author): 刘天霸;石建省;张永波;高业新;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]原华,张庆贺.不等流量双井非稳定流抽水试验参数的确定[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊2):3705-3711.
- [2]聂庆林,高广东,轩华山,等.抽水试验确定承压含水层参数方法探讨[J].水文地质工程地质,2009(4):37-40.
- [3]孙丰英,许光泉,赵宏海,等.稳定井流抽水含水层参数计算机富水性评价[J].资源调查与环境,2009,30(3):229-234.
- [4]于传宁,宗先国,张利红,等.利用抽水试验资料确定水文地质参数[J].地下水,2006,28(1):44-50.
- [5]蒋辉,曾波,潘宏雨.地下水动力学[M].北京:地质出版社,2009.
- [6]Samuel M P,Jha M K.Estimation of aquifer parameters frompumping test data by genetic algorithm optimization technique[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2003,129(5):348-359.
- [7]刘立才,陈鸿汉,张达政.梯度法在水文地质参数估值中的应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2003(3):39-41.
- [8]程璐,朱国荣,江思珉.Theis公式的优选逼近求解及在PocketPC上的嵌入[J].勘察科学技术,2005(3):18-21.
- [9]郭建青,李彦,王洪胜,等.确定含水层参数的混沌序列优化算法[J].中国农村水利水电,2006(12):26-29.
- [10]李林子,朱国荣,江思珉,等.Theis解析模型的数值解及其在MATLAB中的实现[J].江苏地质,2007,31(3):67-71.
- [11]颜俊.遗传算法反演工程水文地质参数[J].铁道工程学报,2007,24(7):20-23.
- [12]肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,等.确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2005,35(6):751-755.
- [13]Davis A D,Stetler L D.Pumping Well Test Analysis:Hellcreek aquifer,North Cave Hills,Harding County,South Da-kota[EB/OL].(2007-11-27)[2011-07-02].http:∥uranium.sdsmt.edu/Downloads/NCH%20Pumping%20Test%20Final.pdf.
- [14]Kim J,Parizek R R.Numerical simulation of the Rhade effectin layered aquifer systems due to groundwater pumping shutoff[J].Advances in Water Resources,2005,28(6):627-642.
- [15]Kim J,Parizek R R.Numerical simulation of the Noordberg-um effect resulting from groundwater pumping in a layered aq-uifer system[J].Journal of Hydrology,1997,202(1/4):231-243.
- [16]Kabala Z J.Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a wellwith wellbore storage and skin[J].Advances in Water Re-sources,2001,24(5):483-504.
- [17]Bardsley W E,Sneyd A D,Hill P D H.An improved methodof least-squares parameter estimation with pumping-test data[J].Journal of Hydrology,1985,80(3/4):271-281.
- [18]Steiner F.Most frequent value and cohesion of probability dis-tributions[J].Acta Geodaetica,Geophysica et Montanistica,1973,8:381-395.
- [19]Steiner F.The most frequent value.Introduction to a modernconception of statistics[M].Budapest:Akademiai Kiado,Hungary,1991.
- [20]高业新,吴庆华,韩玉英,等.抽水含水层对非抽水含水层水位影响的效应分析[J].现代地质,2009,23(4):164-170.
- [21]张文生,何樵登.最小二乘法与反问题误差最优模的选择[J].长春科技大学学报,1996,26(4):454-460.
- [22]王兆磊,周辉.在反演过程中利用不同范数准则压制噪声对反演结果的影响[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(3):919-923.
- [23]Szucs P,Civan F,Virag M.Applicability of the most frequentvalue method in groundwater modeling[J].HydrogeologyJournal,2006,14:31-43.